Don't you think that parents need to be much more strict with their kids these days? - i need a littlest pet shop 16 activation code
I think that parents, children too much freedom is not possible today! I'm 33 and I know that my mother or father would never go into the store, the movies or the mall in my car at the age of 9-16. Those days are little kids (9-16) in the mall all the time with a parent with them. You use the shopping mall, cinemas and pet shops as babysit!
And for what! I have children as young as it is for the 5th Year of looking for a boyfriend / girlfriend seen! What about that! Persons under 16 must go!
The parents are friends of their children! OK, you're the father! You are responsible for this child of his concives time of the day 18th There is no reason that we never their children run around the city itself, or go to the mall all by itself! At least until the age of 16 years. What is wrong with, with them as much as possible!
Friday, February 5, 2010
I Need A Littlest Pet Shop 16 Activation Code Don't You Think That Parents Need To Be Much More Strict With Their Kids These Days?
10 comments:
I agree with you completely. The parents give their children too much freedom. I'm in the middle of a psychology degree and I learned something important that all parents should know their parents, that the task of a father, because children lack the capacity to make informed decisions about their employees. It is faith that the "Let them live many different things to give practical everyday skills. NOT. Children under 20 are not capable of making rational decisions, to understand where the consequences and all aspects of its decision. In fact, contains less than 20 years a child not yet fully developed frontal lobes. The frontal lobe is responsible about all parts of the brain and be processed. Also for the processing of emotions, decision making - and planning. It is the duty of parents to guide their children through young people become productive members of society act as a safe and frontal lobes of his son. The parents must take responsibility for their children to stop and commit themselves to the other parent is not for the artE difficult moments of anger, tears and fights. Your children will thank you when they grow up to be mature and responsible members of society.
I've learned how adults think about children, as it is assumed that all children are fully Braindead and must before any stupidity can be imagined to be protected. God forbid that children learn about drugs, cursing, and sex. Education, not censorship, is the way to do your children what they should not do. I'm just an adult, and I know that much. Either extreme is unhealthy. If you are cautious of your child's life, it grows to deal with more problems and co-dependent.
I think that increases the company through two houses. We have it illegally, our children students. I did not ABUSE! There is a difference. But, raising his voice or the hand of his son and everyone has something to say. Oprah said that hitting is bad, but not change it to a minimum. What happened to the fear or God and parents. Now we all live in fear or childcare. Parents have tied their hands behind their backs, how to raise their children.
yes
His concern for his son, is admirable - but not a little more control? I grew up in the United Kingdom in the 50s and 60s and not older than 7 or 8 years ago I was roaming the city and country for my bike, often a picnic and stay all day. The same goes for all my friends. OK, sometimes I fall and I hurt ourselves, or is in the middle of a friendly confrontation and returned with scratches and bruises - but what they have done for children, and that person's been done. And in case you're wondering - no, I was not a slum boy, the son of respectable parents of the middle class. Trust me too stupid to do something, and they were right.
The risk of their approach, I think, is that your child is anxious and helpless, to grow without doing basic information about the road and can not look after itself - or bothers you, rebels and dangerous things (drugs, alcohol and driving minors unprotected sex or otherwise) only return to you. And his idea that at 16 you should check inevery half hour - without a mobile phone - is totally unrealistic. What kind of society do you think it will be? Take the films to go with his friends - he turned all of 30 minutes? I think not.
The love and care are very good - Loosen but do not forget the apron a little.
Yes. Parents should ...
Yes, I think parents today need strictly to the discipline of their children and in their responsibilities by the time they spend with their children. But I think it's a little too rigid in their thinking and I'm older than you. I grew up in a house) super strict (as described, and the first opportunity I have the rebels who did.
I believe that when children are young, as long as possible, the children can play with their friends in our neighborhood, but a 2-way radio to send with them. My children could have the group in the middle of the school date, and the only day in high school. It is not realistic to believe that teenagers to check in one hour with you every 1 / 2. Every hour or 1 / 2 hours is more realistic. I will not allow my children to the shops and malls, without me or a trusted friend is visiting at the mall, but once their 2-way radio, so I do not have d 'them. I hope my children behave as if they increase, and they know that they lose their privileges for a while. As for the party, my God, this isonly 3, and you have 14 or 15 years. Perhaps your child has no right of A, as long as my children make every effort in each class, the advantages of the adolescence-related right. I think you need to pass the bar there are some less, because maybe your son is not a child prodigy, and never let the child anything. Love your child is unconditional, and the confidence to include them and let them grow to be independent!
I pledge to be tough, but you can not do much. Their only child is 3 years. How do I protect him if he in elementary school and middle or high school? My son is 9 and can protect both. I'm serious, but still soft in some respects. I try to be your friend if you can trust me at all times. I do not think that they do not come to me, because I might be evil. Here, parents can in my opinion, fucking. If a child is called names at school, however, there is much we can do. Your child will learn good and bad, and anything we can do is for the values of good in them and talk about the bad and what is not acceptable if you want to be respected. Your child will fall and hurt and not be there to help him up. Do not be so overprotective. You need to learn how it feels to fall and get up on their own, if you rely on for everything and / or serious problems in life.
I agree with cell phones. I think it's crazy that kids todayPhones from a young age!
yah but if u are too strict, they live on the wrong side, and learn the best free online guide to the outside world, which actually happened to my friend - her mom and dad, too severe, but his mind is diverted drugs strictly good home for their children ... hope u would think!
Yes, parents should more stirct
Post a Comment